05-10-2019, 06:13 PM
SHORT-N-SASSY Wrote:Using the retained Kinetic Energy of that round, at 300 meters (538 ft. lbs.), as a parameter, I compare the following cartridges (all, based on velocites from 16" barrels): MK262, 77-grain, BC- 0.362, MV - 2650 fps.; .300 AAC Blackout, 125-grain, BC - 0.330, MV - 2215 fps; 6.8 SPC, 140-grain Berger VLD, BC - 0.487, MV - 2401 (NOTE: This load is approx. 5,000 PSI above the SAAMI 6.5 Grendel, and has a Cartridge Overall Length of 2.315" vs 2.260" for the Grendel); 6.5 Grendel, 144-grain Lapua FMJBT, BC - 0.636, MV - 2275 fps:Unfortunately, that comparison has significant flaws in regard to the thread topic.
M855 - 538 ft.lbs. @ approx. 328 yards (300 meters);
MK262 - 538 ft.lbs. @ approx. 394 yards;
.300 AAC Blackout - 538 ft.lbs. @ approx. 388 yards;
6.8 SPC - 538 ft.lbs. @ approx. 760 yards;
6.5 Grendel - 538 ft.lbs. @ approx. 925 yards.
First, retained energy is not the criteria that determines maximum effective range.
Second, the 6.8 SPC and 6.5 G bullets are a lot heavier than would likely be used.*
The US Army currently uses lead-free (EPR) projectiles, as shown at right, below.
![[Image: 7943342_orig.png]](http://smallarmssolutions.com/uploads/3/5/3/1/35313045/7943342_orig.png)
The heaviest EPR bullet feasible for 6.5 G is ~123 gr, similar to this EPR for 6.5 CT:
![[Image: img_1530.jpg?w=616]](https://uklandpower.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/img_1530.jpg?w=616)
I think it more likely an EPR for 6.5 G would be ~105 gr, as seen in this lead-free bullet:
![[Image: 105gr-264-flash-tip-lehigh-defense-sku-1...00x500.jpg]](https://www.lehighdefense.com/image/cache/catalog/105gr-264-flash-tip-lehigh-defense-sku-16264105SP-1-500x500.jpg)
https://www.lehighdefense.com/264-match-...5gr-bullet
*Note the 0.449 BC of the 105 gr Flash Tip. More realistic than the 0.636 BC of the 144 gr FMJ.
