12-29-2018, 05:14 AM
I agree with you on par 1 and 3, only that Ruby Ridge par 2, I'm not studied up upon so I'll listen - sounds plausible.
I'm not a fan of gunfree zones either. The point I was proposing is only that more carry is a rational proposal for dealing with public massacres, (certainly making more GF zones hasn't helped) - will that help in fact, hard to say. We won't know unless it is tried. But as you say, it might not help. The true source of the evil comes from inside a person's heart...
My statements about the bump stocks in Vegas is from a legal "not what you know but what can you prove in court" standpoint. A key element in rulemaking is whether it has a complete analysis behind it; I see weaknesses in that analysis. So the best hope in this present scenario is the thoroughness of the legal team that filed the complaint and the fairness of the judge/appeals court/Scotus.
And for the 2 choices, you might be right on that. But even the ban on current weapons might end up like the "ban all hi-cap mags" law in NJ: apparently according to the NJ St police, no hi-cap mags have been surrendered, zilch. -- they are showing once again that it doesn't accomplish much for you to pass a law that you cannot enforce.
I'm not a fan of gunfree zones either. The point I was proposing is only that more carry is a rational proposal for dealing with public massacres, (certainly making more GF zones hasn't helped) - will that help in fact, hard to say. We won't know unless it is tried. But as you say, it might not help. The true source of the evil comes from inside a person's heart...
My statements about the bump stocks in Vegas is from a legal "not what you know but what can you prove in court" standpoint. A key element in rulemaking is whether it has a complete analysis behind it; I see weaknesses in that analysis. So the best hope in this present scenario is the thoroughness of the legal team that filed the complaint and the fairness of the judge/appeals court/Scotus.
And for the 2 choices, you might be right on that. But even the ban on current weapons might end up like the "ban all hi-cap mags" law in NJ: apparently according to the NJ St police, no hi-cap mags have been surrendered, zilch. -- they are showing once again that it doesn't accomplish much for you to pass a law that you cannot enforce.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"