12-28-2018, 02:29 AM
montana Wrote:What she stated was, law enforcement gave no evidence that bump stocks were even used in the Los Vegas shooting or that bump stocks were used in any criminal activity. Since the catalysis for banning bump stocks was the Las Vegas shooting, I would contend this is very relevant to the bump stock ban. She gave pertinent information how bureaucrats, "not the legislature" is creating laws, as 52 expressed concern for in his post. She also explained the actual law describing the definition of a machine gun and the inconsistency and danger the bump stock ban could be for other Constitutional rights. She gave compelling evidence for, "the slippery slope you had asked for before" which seems to be building a foundation for semi auto bans. She also stated concern for taking of private property with out compensation and the lack of due process. I never thought she was screeching or bitching, but gave a very concise and thorough case for threats against our gun and Constitutional rights.
Do you actually believe that the shooter did not utilize the bump stocks found on the weapons that were used in the crime?
LR55