Is Gun Ownership a Right?

[montana]

No. It is exceedingly illogical and irrational to conclude that the unorganized militia must not have any age requirements, when the law defining the unorganized militia clearly sets age requirements.

So please explain the Heller case where service in the militia is not a priority to keep and bear arms. Are you saying the right is not related to the militia?

You are failing to look at historical context and definition. In 1790, "the whole people" did not have the same meaning that it does today.

18% of the country's population were slaves who had no right to keep and bear arms, and were legally considered property, not people.

So your point would be??? This is what the Jim Crow laws past by the democrats tried to keep. The NRA and Republicans saw to it that all people were citizens when the 13th amendment was pasted and all citizens had the right to bear arms.

40% of the population were white females, not required to serve in the militia.

True, but they were never denied the right to bear arms.

Yup. However, with the original militia system having been superseded by the National Guard, there is no longer a need for individuals to have militia weapons. Another....CONUNDRUM!

Once again you neglect truth. The militia laws are still intact whether you acknowledge them or not. The militia can still be called on if needed or asked for.
The federal government recognizes state defense forces, as per the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution, under 32 U.S.C. § 109 which provides that state defense forces as a whole may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the armed forces of the United States, thus preserving their separation from the National Guard. However, under the same law, individual members serving in the state defense force are not exempt from service in the armed forces (i.e., they are not excluded from the draft). Under 32 USC § 109(e), "A person may not become a member of a defense force ... if he is a member of a reserve component of the armed forces."

Nearly every state has laws authorizing state defense forces, and 22 states, plus the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, have active SDFs with different levels of activity, support, and strength. State defense forces generally operate with emergency management and homeland security missions. Most SDFs are organized as army units, but air and naval units also exist.[2][3]

Kind of hard to prevent tyranny in government with an armed population, if the only armed population with effective arms,"militia weapons" are the people in government. Kind of goes against the 2ndA in the first place if that is your irrational logic. As far as you believing miltia weapons are no longer needed, we will definitely have to agree to disagree on that one. King George agreed with you on that one lol.