Is Gun Ownership a Right?

[stanc]

...the heller vs DC states no service in the militia is needed for the right to bear arms, so logically the un-organized militia must not have any age requirements if all people have that right...

No. It is exceedingly illogical and irrational to conclude that the unorganized militia must not have any age requirements, when the law defining the unorganized militia clearly sets age requirements.

There are hundreds of documents stating by the authors of the 2ndA that it is the whole of the people, or all citizens who are the militia.

You are failing to look at historical context and definition. In 1790, "the whole people" did not have the same meaning that it does today.

18% of the country's population were slaves who had no right to keep and bear arms, and were legally considered property, not people.

40% of the population were white females, not required to serve in the militia.

Yet the right to own and bear arms have been infringed, especially with militia weapons. Like I stated....CONUNDRUM!

Yup. However, with the original militia system having been superseded by the National Guard, there is no longer a need for individuals to have militia weapons. Another....CONUNDRUM!