09-29-2018, 04:13 AM
stanc Wrote:a. It is factually incorrect to claim that "all people" have the right to bear arms. Some people are denied that right, such as convicted felons, mental defectives, and children.Yes, as all rights. I was talking about legal gun ownership.
stanc Wrote:a.b. It is unreasonable, illogical, and irrational to assume that all people belong to the unorganized militia, when the law that you yourself cited says it is comprised only of able-bodied, military-age males.Then how does it logically and historically make it a right to bear arms if one is not in the militia?
stanc Wrote:a.I never said there was.Once again,Then how does it logically and historically make it a right to bear arms if one is not in the militia?
stanc Wrote:a.Things have changed in the last 181 years. Well-regulated militias have been superseded by the National Guard, thereby eliminating the need for members to provide their own weapons; there are minimum age limits for buying commonly-available firearms; there are restrictions on the types of arms that private citizens can legally keep and bear; and the courts have repeatedly affirmed -- as in Heller -- that the government can infringe on the RKBA.
Yes, there are two sides to this debate. This is why elections do matter and which side appoints the judges who decides these questions.

