keystone183 Wrote:The idea of a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state is very clear. And i agree that it is indeed why Madison included it! However, the assertion that including that phrase, limits the RIGHT to keep and bear arms to merely the militia, is an overreach.I agree. And in rereading this thread, I see that I did kinda make that assertion in post #54. :o
I really do not know why I wrote what I did in that post. Is it okay if I blame it on montana?
