stanc Wrote:They still do not contradict what I said, so I still have no idea what you were objecting to.
stanc Wrote:I quote you again...What you have quoted are not "The Militia Clauses." "They are not "militia laws"Come on Stan, now your back to your old game. They are the militia clauses from the Constitution and laws.
stanc Wrote:I acknowledge only one what?Type of militia... the organized militia "national Guard"!!!! More games?
stanc Wrote:You keep saying that all citizens are the militia, even though Federal law dating back to 1792 says different.
We have evolved since the days of land owning whites keeping slaves and indentured servants. By the way, many nations and races had slaves during those days, not just the evil white land owners. Yes, "TODAY", all legal citizens of required age,"like all rights", share the same rights. No toddlers voting in elections.
stanc Wrote:I just didn't bother, because the Founders' intent is arguable. Plus, you didn't answer my previous questions related to Madison's intent with his wording of the 2A: How does it logically make it a right to keep and bear arms if one is not in the militia, when the 2A clearly links the militia and the RKBA? Why would the militia even be mentioned if the RKBA is independent of militia membership?
I never said a person didn't need to be in the militia, you did. I said the opposite. DC vs Heller stated the right does not require service in the militia, but it never stated one did not have to be in the militia. Since every legally aged citizen has the right to bear arms, this proves every legally,"of old enough age" citizen not in the organized militia are in the un-organized militia. I gave reference to the, all citizens are the militia,"Georgia supreme court 1837" reference, you have given zero court cases that the un-organized militia and gun rights are age determined,"able body" like the organized militia.

