Florida has started Confication..Good!

[montana]

Montana's post #13, introduced the no-fly list... I was just commenting off of that - ie, imo, it is not a right so it's hard to justify being unconstitutional. Deprivation of a "Bill of Rights" right ("enumerated right") without due process, however, is unconstitutional.
If the right to fly is a right, then I would stand corrected. Hearing crickets, however, I'll keep my statement but only intended in contrast to deprivation of a 2A right...

Current US Code addresses air travel specifically. In 49 U.S.C. § 40103, "Sovereignty and use of airspace", the Code specifies that "A citizen of the United States has a public right of transit through the navigable airspace."

There are, however, a number of other safety and homeland-security-related issues covered in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 449 and Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations in the 1540 series that could impede movement, such as a passenger's name appearing on a "no fly" or "selectee" list. Regardless of the constitutionality of laws passed post-9/11 with respect to freedom of movement being a privilege, all U.S. citizens have the right to travel or move within and between the 50 states without the requirement of submitting to a search of one's person or property prior to travel or movement.

The government puts people on the no fly "selectee" list, not the private carriers. Without due process, it is unconstitutional. Like the 2ndA, our other rights are always being tested and abused.