stanc Wrote:The OP didn't bother to say, but yes, that appears to be the subject of the discussion.
(And your link doesn't work. Please add the letter "t" at the end, so "effec" is "effect")
I doubt that it is possible to craft a law intended to prevent mass shootings which won't adversely affect someone's rights.
Done. Messed up on my "copy and paste"
That's true, of course, but to target a teen who has no weapons to begin with shows both a lack of common sense, a sloppy written law, and an over zealous police force.
As for as "more to the matter" all of which still shows that my above statement is on point and, while we're at it Lawyers devious only until we need them.
"Wild flower, growin' thru the cracks in the street" - Problem Child by Little Big Town