Brett Kavanaugh: Banning a ‘Class of Arms’ Like Banning a ‘Category of Speech’

[stanc]

Guys:

This must be the third or forth thread where the argument concerns the power of the 2A to stop the government from banning certain types of firearms.
Honestly, this unending stream of the same arguments that have infected almost every 2A thread, are getting tiresome.
I don't think anyone here would deny that the Government can and does restrict gun ownership. Just like it can and does restrict other 'rights'.
So, instead of regurgitating the same argument of whether the 2A is absolute or not, how about sticking to the subject of Kavanaugh and his decision in this specific case?

I have twice attempted to get the thread back on track (posts #20 and #28), but to no avail. Perhaps no one is sticking to the subject because there's virtually nothing to discuss.

Since everyone seems to agree with Kavanaugh's opinion that “a ban on a class of arms is...equivalent to a ban on a category of speech,” what more is there to be said about it?