07-21-2018, 04:43 PM
Guys:
What does this have to do with Kavanaugh's opinion.
This must be the third or forth thread where the argument concerns the power of the 2A to stop the government from banning certain types of firearms.
And if anyone wants to read these arguments between Stan and everyone else, all you have to do is go to any 2A thread that has been locked.
Honestly, this unending stream of the same arguments that have infected almost every 2A thread, are getting tiresome.
I don't think anyone here would deny that the Government can and does restrict gun ownership. Just like it can and does restrict other 'rights'.
That doesn't mean the 2A is useless or without power to restrain the government. It does have power to keep the government in check, just like any other right that is written into our Constitution. If you don't think so, Obama would have banned every single firearm in the USA but he didn't because he did not want the legal battle followed by an eventual defeat in the Supreme Court.
So, instead of regurgitating the same argument of whether the 2A is absolute or not, how about sticking to the subject of Kavanaugh and his decision in this specific case?
LR55
What does this have to do with Kavanaugh's opinion.
This must be the third or forth thread where the argument concerns the power of the 2A to stop the government from banning certain types of firearms.
And if anyone wants to read these arguments between Stan and everyone else, all you have to do is go to any 2A thread that has been locked.
Honestly, this unending stream of the same arguments that have infected almost every 2A thread, are getting tiresome.
I don't think anyone here would deny that the Government can and does restrict gun ownership. Just like it can and does restrict other 'rights'.
That doesn't mean the 2A is useless or without power to restrain the government. It does have power to keep the government in check, just like any other right that is written into our Constitution. If you don't think so, Obama would have banned every single firearm in the USA but he didn't because he did not want the legal battle followed by an eventual defeat in the Supreme Court.
So, instead of regurgitating the same argument of whether the 2A is absolute or not, how about sticking to the subject of Kavanaugh and his decision in this specific case?
LR55
