07-17-2018, 11:42 AM
https://www.breitbart.com/california/201...ms-speech/
Quote from the article:
[INDENT]...He referenced these things in the dissent to Heller v. District of Columbia (2011), a suit challenging firearm regulations adopted in D.C. in the aftermath of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).
The Los Angeles Times quoted Kavanaugh writing, A ban on a class of arms is not an incidental regulation. It is equivalent to a ban on a category of speech.
Kavanaughs statement indicates his understanding that the rights protected by the Bill of Rights are of a cloth and possessed by the people on an individual basis. And his use of a First Amendment example to demonstrate the danger of an attack on the Second is a clear indication that he knows that each natural right is to be protected with vigor.
The Times went apoplectic over this...[/INDENT]
Quote from the article:
[INDENT]...He referenced these things in the dissent to Heller v. District of Columbia (2011), a suit challenging firearm regulations adopted in D.C. in the aftermath of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).
The Los Angeles Times quoted Kavanaugh writing, A ban on a class of arms is not an incidental regulation. It is equivalent to a ban on a category of speech.
Kavanaughs statement indicates his understanding that the rights protected by the Bill of Rights are of a cloth and possessed by the people on an individual basis. And his use of a First Amendment example to demonstrate the danger of an attack on the Second is a clear indication that he knows that each natural right is to be protected with vigor.
The Times went apoplectic over this...[/INDENT]
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"