07-05-2018, 12:34 AM
stanc Wrote:Of course. In my previous post, I was only addressing the outcome when a military force does comply with orders to wage war on civilians.
If a platoon of main battle tanks were to assault your neighborhood, that prized AR15 in your hands would be of little more use than a rock.
[video=youtube;_jEQchTqaKA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jEQchTqaKA[/video]
Indeed. Question is, how many Americans place more value on owning an AR15, than on, not just their own lives, but the lives of their wives and children?
No sane person would value an object over the lives of their family or self. The revolutionary war "or any war for that matter" never started over one disagreement. Like I stated before, there would need to be other factors involved to become a shooting war. Any mas gun confiscation of a popular firearm like the AR-15 would be resisted nationally. How the government reacted could be the the other factors that could turn it into a snowball effect. Any unconstitutional order, law, etc. perceived by millions as an attack upon their birth right could be one such factor. As far as debating tank vs AR-15 citizens, I shall repeat myself. Trying to guess the course of any conflict is an act of futility. As far as the movie "The Beast" the hapless villagers eventually did destroy the tank and crew and did run the Russians out of their country
