05-30-2018, 08:22 PM
stanc Wrote:Oh. Since you wrote a rather long paragraph repeatedly complaining about the absence of a clear definition, it appeared that you didn't understand why there is none.
Yea, I can get long winded
stanc Wrote:LOL. No. "User" was chosen because the Gun Digest books also use the term "assault weapon" to include any firearm that the editors wanted to cover in the publication.
That was kinda my point, a term that is meaningless.
stanc Wrote:IMO, 2A supporters are wasting their time harping on the lack of a technical definition. Since it is a useful term for anti-gun activists, they're not going to stop using it.
This is where I disagree, exposing the lefts meaningless term for banning firearms exposes their meaningless accusations. Maybe not for the hopeless kool aid drinkers, but for the fence sitters and uninformed voters, "who can still use logic and reason" it can have a positive effect.
stanc Wrote:It may make Liberty Doll feel smug and self-righteous to ridicule those who talk about assault weapons, but it won't stop the efforts to get anti-gun legislation enacted.
Whats wrong with feeling smug and self-righteous?

It is the undecided voters she could have a positive effect on. The anti's will never stop, that I agree with.

