05-05-2018, 01:54 AM
LR1955 Wrote:SH:The problem with this type of strategy "thinking" is to surrender to the democracy lie. Yes we can vote and yes our rights can be modified, but only by the repeal or amendment process, not by the opinion of the day movement. Because it is done that way does not justify or legitimize it. Everyone votes and supports their candidate but disregarding the original intent of our Constitutional process is to disregard the Constitution in of itself. An elected official who decides to make a play on a meaning, or stack a court to subvert a law for convenience or gain is criminal and should be exposed and held accountable. We as gun owners need to expose these illegal, criminal, UN-Constitutional laws while supporting the candidates who support our legal rights. Playing the anti's game of up is down and night is day is a fools play. If you think there is no crony capitalism in government, I would love to sit down with you someday and tell you about a few I have personally experienced. Lobbyist lobbying Congress is nice euphemism for bribery.
You obviously never had anything to do with the RDTE system in the military, so absolutely false is your statement about chrony capitalism being the decision maker for small arms. Maybe if you read some of the stuff LRRP52 and Stan have been discussing on the Military and Police forum about small arms for the Infantry, you would begin to see what goes on when it comes to small arms development.
So, you agree that the 2A is not stopping the congress from enacting anti gun laws.
It is true and once our side understands that the argument of the 2A or any other right 'guaranteed' by the Constitution can be modified, then maybe we can come up with a strategy to ensure such legislation doesn't happen. Woaah! We can vote! So, if you don't like your career politician, vote for someone else, make your own run for office, and or actively support a candidate you think will do your bidding.
LR55

