Magneto or Labradar?

[Kswhitetails]

So, for those of you that have both or have used both, which of the two would you obtain? What are the drawbacks? I've been tasked with figuring out if the Labradar is worth the additional costs over the V3. The LR coming in at $660 with the unit, case, and base. The V3 coming in at $460 with the rail adapter, phone xfr adapter, tapered spacer kit. It's disappointing that neither have package discounts for these pretty universal combinations. Make the mistake of shooting the V3 bayo - the cost savings is erased.

The LR wins mostly because of versatility and usability beyond rifle, though there may be ways around that.

I'm looking for reasons other than the obvious, that the MS is difficult if not impossible to use with something other than rifle being chief among them.

We are looking to track archery, pistol, and rifle - with and without suppressors. Busy ranges is less of a concern, for now.

Thanks for the info.

We have a ShootingChrony Beta Master optical unit that is suitable - if clumsy - to get the slower/non MS usable shots. It doesn't seem to do well with the rifle speeds when shooting though?

I've read lots of other boards posts, I guess I just trust some of you guys more? Thanks for any input.