CavityBackBullets Wrote:Klem, respectfully.
Many of our projectiles have the capability to stay sub .7 MOA to 1000 yards. Of course provided the shooter and their equipment are up to the task.
I go to my friends at Long Range Shooters of Utah for exactly that reason for long range testing.
I'm very sorry to hear your AR's are not capable of sub MOA performance. All of mine are, even my 7.62x39.
Our projectiles will never be the limiting factor for accuracy of someone's loads.
I personally have to be able to shoot a projectile sub MOA before I will release it to the public. In fact not just me but multiple trusted testers before a projectiles release.
Our projectiles also open up at the longest distance of any LFP tested by rickOshay. You can say I'm advertising our products. However I''m stating facts I can prove. No BS involved, no offense intended.
My point is, no-one can guarantee sub MOA from their bullets without all other shooting variables being equal to or better than the task. Your bullets are only one factor in final group sizes. Others are;
- Shooter
- Environment (e.g. weather, wind, mirage).
- Gun
- Shooting platform (offhand, bipod, light rested, heavy rested).
- Ammunition (powder, case, neck tension, PROJECTILE).
Implying your bullets will produce 0.7MOA is what I was concerned about. Especially in the context that many, if not most forum members use light-weight AR's with what is a relatively low velocity calibre. Sure, you can shoot a Grendel and still have it wobbling around in the sky by the time it gets to 1,000 (relative to larger cases and calibres), but you will never be competitive. My experience of shooting 1,000yards in F-Class competition over a number of years punctuates why we zero at 100 and not 200 or 300 or a 1,000...and that is wind. Even on a still day there is movement of the air body that the bullet is traversing. 0.7MOA at 100yds never translates to 0.7 at 1,000. Notwithstanding, as the bullet slows down its ability to buck the wind diminishes. The ability to group downrange represents the cross-sectional diameters of a blunderbuss, from tight at the breech to wider at the muzzle.
As for what MOA my guns are capable of is an assumption designed to discredit my input. A cheap shot that I will not dignify with a response. I get that you are sensitive about your revenue stream but be careful not to cross the line into ad hominem. Let's keep this discussion factual please.
.