04-14-2018, 07:59 AM
BjornF16 Wrote:Irrelevant. The discussion is on 2A and RKBA. There were NO federal restrictions on concealed carry in the 18th Century.Actually, the discussion was about the accuracy of the quoted article. Nice try at evading the issue, though.
BjornF16 Wrote:All you have to do is look at the debates and published writings to see...yet you refuse.Again you evade the question. If the 2A was meant to cover self defense, why does it only address defense of the state?
It would've required adding only a couple of words, as was done in the Pennsylvania and Vermont RKBA:
Pennsylvania (1776) "...the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state..."