03-26-2018, 05:42 PM
stanc Wrote:Gene, you said: "Lets see some reasonable solutions."
Most pro-gun folks seem to think that actions like locking up individuals who have been adjudicated mentally defective are "reasonable" solutions.
The March for Life crowd obviously thinks that banning AR's is a "reasonable" solution.
What is considered "reasonable" depends entirely upon how one views the issue.
I never implied that AR's are the problem. I explicitly stated that AR's are part of the problem, a point with which you agreed.
It is undeniable that AR's (and high-cap mags) are what have enabled mass shootings like Las Vegas to be conducted.
I like military rifles, so I certainly don't want them to be banned. Anyway, at this point in time, with millions of AR's in circulation, I think a ban would only cause more problems than it could conceivably solve.
I have no recommendations to offer, because I can't see any possible solutions likely to be very effective and practical at preventing mass shootings.
Why does your response not surprise me or anyone else here? Arguing over word usage once again.
Of course you have no recommendations or ideas. You never do. If you did, you would have to face criticism over your ideas.
Before I said you had every right to voice your opinion. We don't need your opinions about someones choice of words or how they are defined anymore. You have gone from being argumentative to disruptive.
So, stay off of this thread. I won't argue with you over word choice. Let me make it very clear -- stay off of this thread.
LR55