03-25-2018, 08:10 PM
F16 you nailed it with this SCOTUS quote, especially in the middle:
(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.
© The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment . Pp. 28–30.
The key that is noted here is that there was a very real fear the Federal government would disarm the citizenry "in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule..." this is precisely what the Left and the Libs are trying to do, in order to allow their own militia to rule over citizens at large, over the entire USA. And this is precisely what the 2A stands in the way of!!!!!
So, to summarize, to regulate away such common individual weaponry as an AR15, contra to 2A, is a real and personal threat to every citizen of the USA, whether they realize it or not. The junta-militia-left-wing gang rule is right on the heels of a successful disarmament, and that's what the left is constantly working for. So we must ever be on guard against it.
By the way, that general disarmament was also a key ingredient of Hitler's rise to power. They are simply following their leader on this point.
Never surrender. Never.
(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.
© The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment . Pp. 28–30.
The key that is noted here is that there was a very real fear the Federal government would disarm the citizenry "in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule..." this is precisely what the Left and the Libs are trying to do, in order to allow their own militia to rule over citizens at large, over the entire USA. And this is precisely what the 2A stands in the way of!!!!!
So, to summarize, to regulate away such common individual weaponry as an AR15, contra to 2A, is a real and personal threat to every citizen of the USA, whether they realize it or not. The junta-militia-left-wing gang rule is right on the heels of a successful disarmament, and that's what the left is constantly working for. So we must ever be on guard against it.
By the way, that general disarmament was also a key ingredient of Hitler's rise to power. They are simply following their leader on this point.
Never surrender. Never.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"