03-19-2018, 07:42 PM
Help me understand the reason to go down to 22 Grendel over 6 Grendel. I can compromise with myself and lower the overall mass from 6.5 to 6, and gain the benefit of the accompanying increase of velocity for similar BC projectiles for target, and even small game. But, why 22? Aren't there already plenty of better than good options out there shooting 223, 556, 22N, etc? Not bashing here, just wondering what the real draw is to the 22 caliber bores. And going that far down really loses terminal performance to a point that the only game would be paper beyond 200, not really all that much better than 223? Again, asking for help understanding the draw going down in caliber. Thanks.
Nothing kills the incentive of men faster than a healthy sense of entitlement. Nothing kills entitlement faster than a healthy sense of achievement.