Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Difference in receiver extension length?
#3
To understand the A5 system, it was developed for the USMC. They were stuck (politically/policy-wise) on the 20" M16 barrel, but they needed something with a collapsible stock - because 20" barrels and A2 stocks suck, for the Marine Corps, in modern combat zones. VLTOR stepped in and developed the system that would mitigate the felt recoil of a 20" RLGS M16 with that collapsible stock.

It works wonders on a Grendel, which kicks just a little harder than a 5.56...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Difference in receiver extension length? - by 98Z - 03-09-2018, 06:39 AM
Difference in receiver extension length? - by 98Z - 03-09-2018, 06:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)