"Why do you need an AR15?"

[grayfox]

My right to keep and bear a militia-style, military style, arm that I would as an ordinary citizen, bring to battle when called upon by the State against its enemies, is a right straight from God and that's how the framers understood it. In that sense, the AR is precisely the type of armament that the Constitution envisages (for today) as being kept and borne by individual citizens. Just as the musket was in 1797, and as the Winchester 1873 was in the late 1800's, and as a musket-ball-pistol was back then, and a 6-shooter was in cowboy days... and as a 1903 would be for the 19-teens-20's, and M1 Garand or Springfield or 1911-45 would be in the 40's... heck in the year 2525 it might just be a laser-zapper rifle thingy, whatever. But today it is the AR. The individual weapon you can own and carry and bring when called upon, to keep and to bear.

The left and the Libs are "afraid" of the AR because they want to disarm everyone but themselves (Dianne Feinstein carries a pistol!!), they believe the govt defines and grants everyone what rights they might "have", and they are in effect in direct opposition to the very foundations of the Constitution. Let's see, Hitler disarmed German citizens and then murdered millions, Stalin did the same, Pol Pot did in Cambodia, Mussolini (the original author of the left's "together forward" motto by the way!!!) Uganda, and so on ... and it was with those types of people in mind that the Founders wrote the 2A they way they did as a counter measure!
Them's my views and I'm stickin' to 'em.