New Cartridge Developments and Implications for Dismounted Infantry Soldiers
LRRPF52 Wrote:Gents,

There has been healthy debate throughout the development of small arms in history regarding appropriate calibers and weapon designs. This is a pretty hot topic in the Grendel community since the Grendel seems to offer external trajectory ballistics that are very similar to 7.62 NATO and some of the common .308 Match loads, but out of a much smaller rifle/carbine package with significantly less recoil, and increased ammunition carrying capacity.

That naturally has led some to propose that we could replace both the 5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO cartridges for dismounted Infantry troops.

I personally do not see a need to replace 5.56 NATO as it has so many advantages that are beneficial to riflemen in an Infantry Squad, however...

I do see a huge need to replace the entire SAW/5.56 system and the M240/7.62 NATO system, since they hold squads and platoons back from being maneuverable. With the recent developments in efficient cartridge & bullet design, I think we're ready to start pushing in the direction of a new Multi-Role Light Machinegun concept with a cartridge that is smaller and lighter than 7.62 NATO, with better ballistic potential as far as trajectory is concerned.
It looks like the Army agrees. https://taskandpurpose.com/army-next-gen...ad-weapon/

P.S. Better take your blood pressure meds before reading. Wink
Reply


Messages In This Thread
New Cartridge Developments and Implications for Dismounted Infantry Soldiers - by stanc - 02-28-2018, 05:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)