02-23-2018, 09:18 PM
grayfox Wrote:Now when it comes to the weapons debate I personally don't mind if bump stocks are restricted/removed... my theory is that a gun should be held to its (reasonable) original intended design... bump stocks, no. 100-round drums... not really a worry to me if they are gone. 20-30 round mags... leave alone b/c they are part of the original design and intent. regular mags for a glock... ok even if 13, 17, 19. A 50-round mag that sticks way down out of the glock.. not so much. I know some may ask where do you draw the line but I think there is a reasonable design line that can be identified.
Again these are my positions and opinions.
Anyone who takes such positions and holds such opinions is aiding the anti-gun agenda.How can pro-gun folks expect to ever prevail, when many (if not most) of them want "reasonable" restrictions on the Second Amendment?