Chamber Question

[RangerRick]

Gentlemen, I appreciate the concerns here, but please act in a respectful manner to all concerned.

Will Do. I'm glad he takes it personally, it shows he cares what people think of his reputation and his products.

I'm willing to concede that my statement that the manufacturer "sold you a defective gun" was premature. The gun could have been damaged in shipping somehow. But that's unlikely without the customer seeing the damage to the packaging or the rifle.

I'll be interested to hear what the problem was.

If John Scott can show us that the failure of this gun was something that happened to the gun after it left his hands, and also not defective parts or workmanship, I'll humbly and publicly apologize and ask that my critical post be removed from the forum.

RR