12-03-2011, 04:04 PM
Ya I was super pissed when I picked that issue up yesterday at the PX! Makes me sick when the first sentence in the article is "If I were to use only one word in describing the company Tactical Rifles, that word would be driven." I can think of a few different words to describe them!!!! Wonder if Guns & Weapons is aware of the piss poor customer service and insane wait that I have received? Hmmm?
I also got a reply thru BBB from Tac Rifles, same old story: "His comments to the BBB are all about obtaining monies that he is not due. He signed a contract that clearly states delivery time is approximate and subject to the supply of components from third party vendors. He is aware that the cartridge only recently gained SAAMI spec and that different ammo specification situation had to be rectified within the industry prior to rifles construction moving forward from a safety perspective."
This guy never stops amazing me!
I also got a reply thru BBB from Tac Rifles, same old story: "His comments to the BBB are all about obtaining monies that he is not due. He signed a contract that clearly states delivery time is approximate and subject to the supply of components from third party vendors. He is aware that the cartridge only recently gained SAAMI spec and that different ammo specification situation had to be rectified within the industry prior to rifles construction moving forward from a safety perspective."
This guy never stops amazing me!
appleseed-kdc Wrote:This is ironic. Note its the future 'Guns & Weapons February 2012 issue.
http://www.tactical-life.com/online/guns...grendel-2/