Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA)
#52
Klem Wrote:The idea of mandatory suppressors on all guns however is fantasy. Not only does it requires all stakeholders to be enthusiastic it would be arguably logistically impossible. The sheer numbers requiring suppression. There would be exceptions; concealed carry permits, Olympic shooters, antique firearms, guns which require a replacement barrel to extend past the frame or furniture, etc. It may be the case at certain rifle ranges in built-up areas, or certain hunting areas but that would be about it. Suppressors represent anathema to the authorities and that's where this debate ends.
You're probably right. At least, I hope you're right. But I still think it's a bad idea for proponents to pitch it as reducing noise pollution. We'll see.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - by stanc - 09-18-2017, 02:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)