Kswhitetails Wrote:Fair enough. Though, if legislation passed easily, we wouldn't be in the 2A forum... Unfortunately, passing any form of legislation regarding the repeal of long standing gun grabs is going to prove more difficult than your previous experience.I've been on this planet almost 73 years. I've seen both California and Federal gun laws continue to grow in number, and become increasingly more restrictive.
I do not recall any major California or Federal gun laws ever being repealed. So, I guess you are saying that repeal will go from impossible to more impossible?
Kswhitetails Wrote:What now, are you going to just let them slowly be taken or continue to be legislated out of your life?It doesn't seem like it's a matter of choice. Judging by history -- not just in this country, but others (Australia, for instance) -- it's a matter of when, not if.
Kswhitetails Wrote:Send your guns my way, you can just roll over on it now and let your experience continue to guide you, I'll "keep trying".Ah, the idealism of youth. I wish you the best of luck.

Kswhitetails Wrote:Absolutely they would. So would the consumer.The consumer is going to love being forced by law to buy and use only suppressed guns, at what, double the price of non-suppressed guns? Seriously?
![[Image: crying.gif]](http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/crying.gif)
Kswhitetails Wrote:And let me ask you, if someone came up with a suppressor that fit reasonably within the frame dimensions of a 1911, would you pack and shoot it? If your new AR came equipped with an integral suppressor free floated inside the hand guard, would you shoot it?If I'm forced to, because those are the only legal options? Well, duh. Of course I would.
Kswhitetails Wrote:If you did, and it didn't bother the neighbor, isn't that win-win? Turn the free market loose on this, and you'll see innovation explode and prices plummet. Fairly Micro, but lawfully supported.There's a huge difference between being "supported" by law, and being required by law.

