Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA)

[LRRPF52]

Thank you for providing real world examples that validate my theory. Argue on the grounds of noise pollution control, and it may come back to bite us in the ass by making suppressor use mandatory.

Not when the Committee communists (there are over 100 members of the US House of Reps who are members of shells for CPUSA, and 20 Senators including both Dems and Republicans) call their chief "expert witness" who is the lead sales representative for Shot Spotter, who just launched their IPO in July.

Their FAQs used to say suppressors defeated their technology. Now they say they can detect it. I wonder how many of the Congressrats purchased Shot Spotter IPO when it was opened, who are counting on the 300% stock increase projections, especially as they push for legislation to mandate more and more use of Shot Spotter in cities.

The Sacramento Police Department likes the technology so much that it is expanding its use into a second area of the city, said police Sgt. Bryce Heinlein.

The capital city began using SpotShotter in July 2015 in the Del Paso Heights area, covering a three-mile radius. It used money raised from assets seized from criminals to pay the $180,000 cost of the first year of operations, as well as $155,000 for 2016.

Since it began operating, the technology has resulted in officers responding to 270 gunshot incidents, resulting in 310 arrests and the confiscation of 75 illegal firearms, Heinlein said.

“It’s very effective,” he said.

The approved expansion into another area of the city is expected to cost $200,000.

ACLU has some problems with Shot Spotter, which is why the Dems in the Committee never addressed this publicly, but when you go back and listen to all the testimony and leading questions from the filthy vermin, you can see what they're talking about. I can see why they don't want to bring any attention to the ACLU's complaints with the main company that their expert witness is part of.

The privacy concern involves the potential that audio sensors could pick up the conversations of people walking by, activists say, noting cases where prosecutors have used comments recorded by sensors as evidence in court.

In 2010, prosecutors in Oakland won a conviction in the murder of Tyrone Lyles after his last words, recorded by ShotSpotter, were played in court.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-c...story.html

Follow the money proves to be as relevant of a guideline today, and the rats don't like any sunshine on their corruption.