Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA)

[stanc]

A very unlikely scenario I think we all agree.

Using that logic, suppressors could become compulsory regardless of whether the gun lobby uses noise pollution to argue for greater access to suppressors or not. Mufflers on cars are compulsory so by the same token, why not make it the same for guns? Kind of like, 'Be careful what you wish for' as the government decides, OK, you want suppressors, then everyone has to have them from now on.

A logical but extremely unlikely scenario.

Why do you say it's extremely unlikely? Pollution controls imposed by government are not left to the people to decide whether or not to implement them.

If you want to effectively control gun noise pollution, suppressor use will have to be mandatory for all firearms. This ploy can only backfire on gunowners.