Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA)
#32
TomSawyerNW Wrote:I admit I'm only partly following this, but I have interest in this issue. I like to shoot, and I hate that the neighbors don't like the noise. And frankly speaking, I don't care to be sitting on the deck in the evenings and hearing shooting noise a couple fields over. Noise pollution.
Again with the "noise pollution" nonsense. Rolleyes

I suppose that the person who came up with this idea, and all of the shooters who repeat it, probably think they are being very clever in employing an environmentalist argument.

If I were a strategist for anti-gun groups, I would have them agree with removing restrictions on suppressors on the grounds it would benefit the public by reducing noise pollution.

Then, as with noise pollution control devices on motor vehicles, I would have them lobby Congress to make it mandatory that all firearms have suppressors attached when in use.

Imagine the effect on concealed (or even open) carry of handguns.

[Image: walther_torch.jpg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - by stanc - 09-16-2017, 08:51 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: