US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5
montana Wrote:All those who participated in the trials preferred it for its better handling and faster follow up shots. Ian even stated the slight difference in weight and length felt much better than it would seem on paper. I guess the true test would be to shoot them side by side.
I'm not questioning the perceived difference in handling.

I'm saying the difference in length is negligible, so small that it can barely be discerned even when the rifles are side-by-side.

There's no way in Hell that Ian could feel the tiny difference in length. What he is actually noticing is the difference in weight.

Nominal weight of the T3E2 is the same as the M14, which is actually a bit longer than the M1, but handles noticeably better.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5 - by stanc - 09-13-2017, 08:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)