US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5
#87
stanc Wrote:Those are different subjects than what has been under discussion: Lead-core vs lead-free bullet effectiveness.

Yes and I was only trying to see if the M855A1 is as good as some reported it was. The cost and actual effectiveness per round is what is the subject if I'm not mistaken. I'm getting conflicting reports on the M-855A1 round and just wanted to discus it, not get into an argument.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5 - by montana - 04-28-2017, 05:08 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)