US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5

[stanc]

So the rumors that the new M855A1 is near proof load in pressure, cutting the service life of our weapon plat forms in half is false? The rumor that it violates our agreement with NATO since the new mags and pressures are not NATO compatible and other members refuse to use it in their weapon plat forms is also false?

Those are different subjects than what has been under discussion: Lead-core vs lead-free bullet effectiveness.