US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5
#67
LR1955 Wrote:Stan / Guys:

Problems with '800 meter capability' for the average soldier.

<snip>
Gene,

I fully agree with your analysis. I've made similar points in past threads.

The question is, are there factions in the Army who really are pushing for a 7.62 interim battle rifle? I've not yet seen substantiation for the story, although the statement by PEO Soldier about 800-meter capability does give some credence.

Also, I'd appreciate your thoughts on the body armor question in post #61 above.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5 - by stanc - 04-27-2017, 02:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)