US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5
#40
LR1955 Wrote:L8:

Same thing in 1976. M-14A1E-2 I believe. I am convinced they made us carry it because it was heavy. It didn't cycle when fired. Did yours actually work? If not, I bet you got the same one I carried five years earlier.

LR55

Actually, the only redeeming quality for me was that it shot significant flame out of the barrel when firing blanks. May or may not have been used to motivate "OPFOR" to surrender Smile. They did not trust us with live ammo - we were extremely sleep deprived.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5 - by Lightning8 - 04-12-2017, 11:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)