US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5
#38
LRRPF52 Wrote:Do people not think this through?

Who are we talking about again? LOL

Lightning8 Wrote:Every time I see this type thread, I am reminded of Ranger school in 1981 when I "volunteered" to carry a M14, the heavy mags, and the heavy ammo for the Mountain phase. The m14 was used as the "squad automatic weapon" in those days. I was very happy to give up that M14 and carry a M16A2 for the rest of the class (when I was not carrying a M60). Most people who think 308 or such "battle rifles" are cool never had to carry one every day, day after day. You carry one a whole lot more than you shoot one.

I do think they are cool. I would love a Garand or a M1A (or even a '73 trapdoor). I know they are big bulky and awkward but heck, there is a ton of history behind them and that is cool to me. In their day they were top of the line but time marches on...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
US Army Considers Adopting an Interim Battle Rifle in 7.62NATO: eventually adopt 6.5 - by 85_Ranger4x4 - 04-12-2017, 09:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)