10-11-2011, 08:43 PM
the .264 LBC has a .295" neck with a differant throat (1.5 degree if I recall correctly).
The Grendel has a .300" neck with a compound throat.
Outside that NO differance at all, ask Honady as they produce brass for both and the ONLY differance in the brass is the headstamp.
which one?? I have not fired the LBC chamber to see if I like it better or not. In order to fairly evaluate would some please send me a barrel and bolt to evaluate say for a year. So I can post a fair evaluation of the two
Honestly on a redo I believe I would go with the LBC/CSS chamber (actually a CSS) as the tighter neck would:
1. extend case life
2. in a personal belief (no facts supporting) would have a probablity to be more accurate
On the throat (caution this may be Kool Aid) from what I am lead to believe would be easier to load for a 1.5 degree throat versus a compound throat (may not be fact, just a personal belief, YMMV).
The Grendel has a .300" neck with a compound throat.
Outside that NO differance at all, ask Honady as they produce brass for both and the ONLY differance in the brass is the headstamp.
which one?? I have not fired the LBC chamber to see if I like it better or not. In order to fairly evaluate would some please send me a barrel and bolt to evaluate say for a year. So I can post a fair evaluation of the two
Honestly on a redo I believe I would go with the LBC/CSS chamber (actually a CSS) as the tighter neck would:
1. extend case life
2. in a personal belief (no facts supporting) would have a probablity to be more accurate
On the throat (caution this may be Kool Aid) from what I am lead to believe would be easier to load for a 1.5 degree throat versus a compound throat (may not be fact, just a personal belief, YMMV).