11-13-2015, 03:09 AM
BigBC Wrote:Considering this as well, it felt good in the hand and shooting with it as well. Didn't have the shelf on it, but still felt better than the standard M-16 grip and when you are going for range and accuracy like we are trying to do, every little bit of comfort helps IMO.
Also I can offer a brief insight to the Luth MBA stock. Currently have one on a completed AR-15 lower and my 6.5 upper just shipped yesterday from TX. Getting all ants in my pants, so I threw on my 5.56 upper just to mess around with the Luth stock. I felt it was solid (keep in mind 5.56 @50 yards kneeling) I've used the PRS before and it also is a solid stock (5.56 DMR). The adjustable cheek weld is a great thing to have and both stocks will do great. The Luth is lighter when I had both in hand at the gun shop. The Luth feels stable and comfortable in the kneeling position. If you want to split hairs the Luth may be better for tactical sniper competitions due to the lighter weight = less fatigue over time, if you can even take it that far. The "fatigue" factor there will be more dependent on the kind of shape you're in.
For the money, IMO the Luth MBA does just as good a job as the Magpul PRS. when it comes down to it whatever gives you more confidence/comfort will help you shoot better.
appreciate the input.
as far as my two stock options, im still leaning more towards the PRS. i have a preference towards heavy when it comes to my rifles. i am not set for certain though. from what i have been hearing the only real difference between the two is the weight. with the price difference, its tempting to go with the luth ar. but we will see.