Lsat
#5
fyi
tony williams Wrote:just watched an updated presentation on ct/lsat. A few points:

- continued development of 5.56mm on hold because the army needs more lethality and doesn't believe 5.56mm can deliver. Hence the interest in 6.5mm.

- in ballistic comparisons with 5.56mm and 7.62mm, 6.5mm wins across the board except in recoil vs 5.56mm.

- the caliber configuration study which resulted in the identification of 6.5mm was task i for ct/lsat.

- task 2 is to produce 6.5mm ammo and a carbine for a capability demo (trl 5) by mid-2016.

- task 3 is to produce 7.62mm ammo and an mg to the same trl 5, also by mid-2016. The initial load will apparently be based on the m80 (?)

the army apparently is still interested in 7.62mm because of its higher lethality.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/m...sg=6257.22
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Lsat - by stanc - 07-16-2011, 05:22 PM
Lsat - by LRRPF52 - 07-17-2011, 10:09 AM
Lsat - by stanc - 07-17-2011, 04:54 PM
Lsat - by Tony Williams - 07-18-2011, 06:40 AM
Lsat - by stanc - 07-16-2015, 06:31 PM
Lsat - by LRRPF52 - 07-16-2015, 06:44 PM
Lsat - by stanc - 07-16-2015, 07:39 PM
Lsat - by BluntForceTrauma - 07-16-2015, 08:25 PM
Lsat - by LRRPF52 - 07-16-2015, 09:13 PM
Lsat - by biodsl - 07-17-2015, 03:29 AM
Lsat - by stanc - 07-17-2015, 05:48 AM
Lsat - by cory - 07-17-2015, 02:51 PM
Lsat - by stanc - 07-17-2015, 04:51 PM
Lsat - by LRRPF52 - 07-17-2015, 05:00 PM
Lsat - by stanc - 07-17-2015, 08:39 PM
Lsat - by LRRPF52 - 07-17-2015, 10:12 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)