05-18-2015, 01:13 PM
Variable Wrote:That all just blows my mind! I look at an AR, and I've dinked with them so long that my brain just "sees" how they work. This new stuff will take a while (if ever) for me to actually intrinsically "get it".....
I'm not calling them liars, but it's hard for me to accept that it's accurate with a seperate moving chamber like that. If they say it is, then I know it must be, but that just seems so weird to me.
Of course it's more accurate. They're using essentially custom hand loaded ammunition vs military rounds that have a 2 moa (I think it's 2) requirement in an M4. I do hope it works as well as they say it does.
However, I do have my doubts. Watching that video I see a couple of places in the mechanism that could cause significant jamming if everything doesnt work properly. I have serious doubts on the decreased maintenance time. I don't see how caseless ammunition doesn't leave the chamber area absolutely filthy. But with that rotating chamber it could be much easier to clean than the current one.
stanc Wrote:...Surely you don't seriously think the military would give a belt-fed LMG to every infantryman?
Perhaps. But how do you propose to achieve such a high BC if bullet weight is in the 100-110gr range? The 107gr MatchKing only has a 0.406-0.420 BC, depending on velocity, and I doubt that would be improved upon with a lead-free, ball round.
I don't think he meant that platform, but the caseless ammunition technology.
You're still living in the AR15 world buddy. With caseleess ammunition why would we be subjected to a 115gr limit?
"Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin

