Journalism professor calls for military firing squads to be used against the NRA

[TheOTHERmaninblack]

So inoffensive as to be ineffective and opaque. McGuire's main thesis was MK/Ultra refined not only manipulation of individuals but also manipulation of the masses by media, who is and who is not heard (the Maddow and Jones shadow play being a topic). How then can you sidestep MK/Ultra by simply waving your arms, invoking first your excuses for not reading the article (while deigning to discount it), and then invoking your perspicacity?

Go figure.

Because, if I can't trust him to get the easy stuff right, how can I trust him on the hard stuff?

[montana]

Wasn't speaking about MK Ultra. I know that it has been admitted. These eyes, they do see. This mind, though, it does think. And a guy who can't tell that uneducated=/=unintelligent has some issues. Just to pick an inoffensive one.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/0...f-america/

Case in point

[Deer Hunter]

The basic BS that the left pushes. "We are not going to take your guns". We want sensible regulations (like they would allow that for abortion)"

His real self comes out when he was to use the force of government to kill gun owners, the NRA and radical rightwingers (ie libertarians).


Quote:
Normally, I am a peaceable man, but in this case, I am willing to answer the call to defend the country. From them.

To turn the song lyric they so love to quote back on them, "We'll put a boot in your ---, it's the American way."

Except it won't be a boot. It'll be an M1A Abrams tank, supported by an F22 Raptor squadron with Hellfire missiles. Try treason on for size. See how that suits. And their assault arsenal and RPGs won't do them any good.
End Quote

http://www.wvgazette.com/Opinion/OpEdCom...1305300071

I can only hope this PRICK is the one knocking on our doors when they TRY to take our guns. I for one don't need a gun or an Abrams tank to put a size 13 up their A$$. Bring it!

[Nukes]

Because, if I can't trust him to get the easy stuff right, how can I trust him on the hard stuff?

You stated he made "slips" that showed he was "agenda driven." Having an agenda doesn't necessarily make one "wrong." Unless a man is an empty man with no values, complaining that someone has an "agenda" without specifying the agenda usually means that he has a different agenda. Maybe your agenda is wrong.

Factual errors and logical fallacies are intrinsically and necessarily "wrong," but you cited no such errors.

[Nukes]

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/0...f-america/

Case in point

Those professors have an agenda. [laughing]

[bow shot]

"Could be he's off his meds, went through a manic stage, then crashed....it's common."

Interesting that the therepists, shrinks, acedemics etc. all have this fantastic career: "I have a name for your mental state. Here's your drug. Next!"

Its time (ha ha haaaaaa!!!!) for these bone-heads to realize that all this crap that they have names for are not erroneous, invalid, and aberrant "syndromes" and "disorders", they are the natural state of a society that was suckled by their stupid and damning philosphies.

Can we go to all these enlightened ones now, and say, "this nation is destroyed....your ideas didn't work... we get our money back, right?"