Have you looked through this thread:
http://www.65grendel.com/forum/showthrea...light=amax ?? It should put at least some of your concerns to rest.
Swapping bullets, while doable, has a lot of unknowns that would cause even many experienced handloaders to hesitate.
If the discussions in the referenced thread aren't enough to ease some concerns, you might be able to do a test that would tell you if they are "good enough" without a whole lot of hassle:
[INDENT](1) Line up 5-6 water-filled milk jugs at the closest range you might sensibly take a shot. Shoot the center of the first one and you will get an interesting splash on this one and the next 2 or 3. Expect to get wet if you take that shot from less than 10 yards!
With luck, the bullet and most of its fragments will be in the 3rd or 4th jug unless it holds together like a premium bullet.
If you are OK (not the same as delirious with joy over perfection) with the results, then go to step 2.
(2) Repeat this at the
longest range you would ethically consider taking a shot. The bullet will hold together a bit better and you might have difficulty retrieving it the first time or two.
The difficulty arises because you are likely to hit closer to an edge at the longer ranges, making it easier for the bullet to depart the line of jugs.
This also presents an interesting test of your initial judgement of your longest ethical range. If you completely miss the first jug more than 2 out of 5 shots, you might want to knock 20% of the range so you will be sure of getting into the vital zone every time. (Yes the moose has a huge vital zone compared to deer, but being sure saves a bit of misery.)[/INDENT]
The test can be done at intermediate ranges to get a more complete picture.
A neat side effect of this kind of testing is that the milk jugs take up a lot less space in the recycle bin since many of them get shredded and most have holes that allow for easy crushing.