Have a look at this bore
#1
This is an AR that has about 200 rds through it. It's an FN chf chromed barrel from PSA. I wasn't real happy with the way it was shooting (1.5" with premium ammo and 3+ with Federal bulk ammo), so I decided to have a look at the bore. These marks are in the first and last 6 inches of the barrel. The rifling in the middle of the barrel looks good.

So should I keep shooting and see if it gets better? Maybe work on it a little with bore paste and see what that does? Call PSA and see what they have to say? What do you think?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14759[/ATTACH]


Attached Files
.jpg   chatter.jpg (Size: 43.15 KB / Downloads: 163)
- Kirk -
Reply
#2
I guess it depends. Is it just a noise maker i.e. range blaster? Are is the role of the rifle something more important?

If it was mine and it was just a ammo waister, range blaster, noise maker. I would live it alone and just rebarrel it once it's burnt out.

If it's for something more important. I would probably give PSA a chance to replace it. If not I would just buy a better barrel and move on.
Reply
#3
I'm not good at interpreting interior barrel marks, but will offer this comment...
Chrome lining a barrel is not so much for accuracy as for durability, since the chromium layer is - relatively speaking - thick and hard to keep uniform, when compared to a stainless polished barrel, or even to a nitrided barrel (and for nitriding, its value will depend on how smooth the barrel surface was before application, it is however only a few microns thick, basically infused down into the surface, so much easier to keep smooth than chrome).

You're already an extra - what, $100-$200 extra into this one due to the ammo shot plus the cost of the barrel, if you can find an acceptable use for it fast, then ok. Otherwise I'd suggest looking into a better barrel that will shoot pretty much out of the gate. I got rid of even a couple of moderately-good barrels b/c they weren't getting up to speed, found some better ones. And the next one I do, if I do one, will be at least a Lilja for the same reasons.

Anyway, that's my thinking.
We are too soon old and too late smart. Smile I'm definitely in this boat!
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Reply
#4
This rifle is not intended to be a match rifle but I'm hoping to get a little more out of it than I have so far. My other ARs shoot bulk ammo at 2" or better and around an inch with good stuff. Granted, they have BA barrels rather than factory mil spec ones but I still think there's room for improvement on this one. I'm not opposed to replacing this barrel if I have to but that would kinda suck since it's essentially new. I don't know what kind of accuracy guarantee PSA has if any. I bought this thing a few years ago and it's been in the safe since then. They do say they're warranted to be free of defect or poor workmanship though so who knows?
- Kirk -
Reply
#5
did a quick google search
there are threads over on arfcom about fn chf barrels

your accuracy is normal from the ones i have read
Reply
#6
You could try some JB paste in it just to see but accuracy is usually not great with chrome lined bore unless it’s done really well
Member since 2011, data lost in last hack attack
Reply
#7
mdram Wrote:your accuracy is normal from the ones i have read
Hmm, I see what you mean. Like I was saying, I bought this thing a few years ago. There were a couple small issues (canted sight, etc). Instead of fixing it, PSA sent me this one. The original was significantly more accurate so I expected the same kind of performance from the replacement. I'm starting to think maybe that first one was a fluke.
- Kirk -
Reply
#8
kcb38 Wrote:Hmm, I see what you mean. Like I was saying, I bought this thing a few years ago. There were a couple small issues (canted sight, etc). Instead of fixing it, PSA sent me this one. The original was significantly more accurate so I expected the same kind of performance from the replacement. I'm starting to think maybe that first one was a fluke.

remember its CHF, which is the fastest, cheapest way to make a barrel.
i have no proof, but i put them low on the accuracy cart, and repeatability for manufacturing
Reply
#9
you could sell it for, maybe 75-100? and be back in the game for a decent one...
someone could use a blaster type barrel.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Reply
#10
might get more than that
chf and fn have people that love them
Reply
#11
If I replace it, I will definitely consider selling it to recoup some of the cost. I was eyeballing yet another BA (Aero) barrel if I go that route:
https://www.aeroprecisionusa.com/556-20-...cmv-barrel
- Kirk -
Reply
#12
kcb38 Wrote:If I replace it, I will definitely consider selling it to recoup some of the cost. I was eyeballing yet another BA (Aero) barrel if I go that route:
https://www.aeroprecisionusa.com/556-20-...cmv-barrel

Nice barrel sure wish it said 5R, only thing missing. It has the QPQ
Reply
#13
It's a hassle free option for sure. I could pick any barrel but then I'd have to get the fsb installed. This one's got their 1 moa guarantee and has all the goodies installed already. I may start watching for a sale...
- Kirk -
Reply
#14
Oh geez, I see they give you 10% off your first order. That could be the kicker. Rolleyes
- Kirk -
Reply
#15
kcb30, If you intend to keep the barrel you may want to look into fire lapping.
Reply
#16
go look at their BA stuff on armorally.com, lots of times it's a way better price.

unless you're going really retro, get a free-floating one, even one with fluting (lighter but still plenty stiff).
Tough to pass up! joebob's has low-price but decent handguards.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Reply
#17
I'll keep them in mind. They don't seem to stock the one I posted but they do have the 20" Gov't profile for $140. I'd have to get the FSB installed on that one. Might be worth it though.
- Kirk -
Reply
#18
I have seen some fsb's you can put on, somewhere, don't remember. should be fairly straightforward...

edit: even better... get a gas block w/ pic rail on top and put your own fsb-height collapsible iron sight on it.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Reply
#19
Late to the conversation but this seems to be a common thread over the years. Shooters expecting better results from cheap barrels. If you can get 1.5-MOA through a cheap chrome barrel then there's nothing wrong with it...It is what it is.

The AR is the cheapest high-power, centrefire on the market. It's a light-weight, auto-loader. If you want almost as good as heavy, bolt gun potential then you have to buy the type of barrel they use; stainless, match, hand lapped and pony-up for the cost.

They might accept it back but morally I don't think they should.
Reply
#20
Klem Wrote:...Shooters expecting better results from cheap barrels. If you can get 1.5-MOA through a cheap chrome barrel then there's nothing wrong with it...It is what it is.

They might accept it back but morally I don't think they should.
Honestly the only thing I expected was for this one to shoot as well as the one I bought. I regret returning it. When I didn't see similar accuracy I started looking for the reasons why, which brought me to the bore with the funky chatter or tool marks in it. Not having much experience with that kind of thing I posted it up here because I've always gotten good advice from you guys. I don't expect sub MOA but I don't think 3+ with factory ammo cuts it these days either.

That being said, I'm finding out that my results are pretty typical when it comes to these barrels so I don't think mine is a special case even with the bore looking like it does. There weren't many reviews of these things before I bought one so I could only compare it to what I had. Now that I know a little more, I don't expect them to take it back a second time. I'll chalk it up to experience and replace it if I decide I can't live with it.

ETA: I don't know if I mentioned it but the first one went back because of a canted fsb and a couple other issues.
- Kirk -
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)