Please explain "standard" versus "adjustable."
Posts: 4,444
Threads: 97
Joined: Mar 2011
There are two WCI brakes. One is what appears to be a standard "pepperpot" type brake. It is more effective than other similar brakes I have seen, so I'm not sure what WCI has done differently, but it is very effective, and has no significant point of impact change on the rifles I have seen it used on.
The second is "adjustable" allowing you to go from fully braked to fully unbraked by twisting the body of the brake. It is actually a sleeved brake, and when the sleeve is rotated, the brake holes are closed, making the rifle function as if there is no brake. It is also very effective, with the disadvantage that the body diameter is greater because of the sleeve.
The adjustable brake is useful if you shoot at a range that doesn't allow or discourages brakes because they are louder than standard rifles, or in competitions where brakes are not allowed.
Both brakes are significantly less obnoxious than gill brakes and just as effective, in my experience.
Please explain "standard" versus "adjustable."
I have used the FSC 30, and the Warped brake on 6.5 Grendels. The FSC30 doesn't provide nearly the recoil reduction of the WCI brake. I think the primary reason why it doesn't work as well as the WCI brake is because it was made for a 30 caliber bullet, not a 26 caliber bullet. Too much gas gets by beside the bullet for the FSC 30 brake to work at optimum level.