06-08-2018, 01:17 AM
55 was looking lonely down there at 26" so included my 6mm. I does just say Grendel after all.
Let's go Brandon!
| Poll: What Barrel Length on Your Grendel AR(s)? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| 10" | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 12" | 28 | 6.57% | |
| 14" | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 16" | 76 | 17.84% | |
| 18" | 109 | 25.59% | |
| 20" | 127 | 29.81% | |
| 22" | 17 | 3.99% | |
| 24" | 55 | 12.91% | |
| 26" | 2 | 0.47% | |
| Total | 426 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
What Barrel Length on Your Grendel AR(s)?
|
|
06-08-2018, 01:17 AM
55 was looking lonely down there at 26" so included my 6mm. I does just say Grendel after all.
Let's go Brandon!
07-30-2018, 03:36 AM
LRRPF52 Wrote: Very very good info....... Came across this thread as you just got me drooling over your 12 inch build. I think I might need to build me a 10- 12 pistol braced Grendel.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. ― George Orwell
08-12-2018, 01:45 PM
mdewitt71 Wrote:Very very good info....... Came across this thread as you just got me drooling over your 12 inch build. The performance of the 6.5 grendel per the above table is impressive - Im particularly impressed with the performance at 16 inches, however, I entered similar info into StrelokPro (using the hornady 123 sst from the cartridge database)and it shows the bullet going subsonic at between 850 and 900 yards. Am I doing something wrong?
08-12-2018, 03:30 PM
jnr2233 Wrote:The performance of the 6.5 grendel per the above table is impressive - I’m particularly impressed with the performance at 16 inches, however, I entered similar info into StrelokPro (using the hornady 123 sst from the cartridge database)and it shows the bullet going subsonic at between 850 and 900 yards. Am I doing something wrong? He is most likely way more above sea level then you are. Feet above sea level has alot to do with it.
08-12-2018, 04:14 PM
Ok I didnt think of that - Ill take a look at that - thanks.
08-12-2018, 05:27 PM
jnr2233 Wrote:Ok I didn’t think of that - I’ll take a look at that - thanks. Hey no problem glad I could help.
08-12-2018, 06:02 PM
His explanation below the graph says he is using standard atmospheric conditions... sea level= 29.53 inHg, 59* F.....
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
08-12-2018, 06:55 PM
grayfox Wrote:His explanation below the graph says he is using standard atmospheric conditions... sea level= 29.53 inHg, 59* F..... Sorry didn't see that. Just figured it was for the altitude he lives and shoots at.
08-12-2018, 07:00 PM
grayfox Wrote:His explanation below the graph says he is using standard atmospheric conditions... sea level= 29.53 inHg, 59* F..... Ok I used the above pressure and temperature assumptions with the hornady 123sst at 2580 FPS muzzle velocity in strelok and its showing the round going subsonic before 900 yards. Im using the cartridge database in strelokpro for the g7 coefficient. Not sure what could be causing the difference here.
08-12-2018, 11:01 PM
jnr2233 Wrote:Ok I used the above pressure and temperature assumptions with the hornady 123sst at 2580 FPS muzzle velocity in strelok and its showing the round going subsonic before 900 yards. Im using the cartridge database in strelokpro for the g7 coefficient. Not sure what could be causing the difference here. Interesting - I think the chart above might be somewhat optimistic. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|