bwaites Wrote:No idea what the BPC is, why wouldn't you want a barrel chambered with a chamber guaranteed to shoot all the Grendel ammo available?
I like to think outside the box. I find it self satisfying to try different things to see if they work. When they do work it makes it worth the while and when they don't, oh well it was woth the try for me. Here's an article I read last week that got me thinking
Saturday, March 13th, 2010
There has been a lot of noise and confusion around the 6.5 GrendelĀ® and the similar cartridges that have sprung up around it. Two have surfaced that bear a closer look. The 6.5 BPC has become “the” bolt action chambering that can safely fire Grendel ammo. The differences in the chamber dimensions are minor; the 6.5 BPC was developed by Jim Borden and Dr. Louis Palmisano, the latter of PPC fame. The newest entry into this race is the 264 LBC-AR™ from Les Bear Custom, as the name implies this
Headstamped brass by Hornady
chambering is optimized for the AR platform. The biggest difference between these variations is that fact that the latter two are open use, in other words, anyone can chamber for them, like any factory cartridge.
Some sources call the BPC and the LBC cartridges “improved”. When you compare the drawings this is improved label is pretty hard to understand. There is little difference aside from the tolerances for case expansion, and the throat design. They do have a 30 degree shoulder verses a 28 degree shoulder on the Grendel, however, this will not provide any noticeable change in ballistics as the volume of the case is virtually unchanged. In fact, 2 degrees is barely outside the tolerance limits that most tool makers offer.
http://wildcatintel.com/blog/?m=201003
Any thoughts,
Shivesy