02-14-2015, 03:19 PM
I posted this over on ARFCOM too, but since this board is specifically geared to Grendels input from the horde would be great.
I know this is subjective, but thought I would ask anyway. I am looking for some opinions of people that have both UBR and PRS stocks on some precision rifles.
I have a 6.5 Grendel running a 20" barrel, 15" rail, bipod, etc... Needless to say it is already on the portly side. That being stated, the weight of either stock is not really a concern for me. I have tried an ACS-L and an ACS on (and even had one of my STR's) on it just for feel. I liked all of them, the cheek weld felt really good to me. Yet another "time for another tweak customization" on my rifle came up. Those "one more thing and it'll be done" moments never really seem to apply or stick. I had always thought I would use either an UBR or PRS on the project but could not decide on which.
I have acquired an new UBR. I have not mounted it, but on looking at it out of the box I like the way this stock is designed (then again, I like Magpul and expected this to be the case). I had originally wanted a PRS because it could be adjusted and would allow a little more fitting of the rifle to me. This is due to the optic/mount I am using right now. That of course is subject to change. For now, the gun is a lot of bench shooting just to see what my project is capable of, but that is not always going to be the case.
The question(s) is(are), what do you feel is the benefit of one or the other? Have you swapped for one out for the other? Does the PRS's adjustability really offer that much? I have a feeling the weight factor of either will actually balance the rifle out nicely. The consensus will probably be get both and that will probably be the case when I go to do another build. For right now I am wondering if I keep the UBR or cycle it out for a PRS.
Thanks for any/all input.
I know this is subjective, but thought I would ask anyway. I am looking for some opinions of people that have both UBR and PRS stocks on some precision rifles.
I have a 6.5 Grendel running a 20" barrel, 15" rail, bipod, etc... Needless to say it is already on the portly side. That being stated, the weight of either stock is not really a concern for me. I have tried an ACS-L and an ACS on (and even had one of my STR's) on it just for feel. I liked all of them, the cheek weld felt really good to me. Yet another "time for another tweak customization" on my rifle came up. Those "one more thing and it'll be done" moments never really seem to apply or stick. I had always thought I would use either an UBR or PRS on the project but could not decide on which.
I have acquired an new UBR. I have not mounted it, but on looking at it out of the box I like the way this stock is designed (then again, I like Magpul and expected this to be the case). I had originally wanted a PRS because it could be adjusted and would allow a little more fitting of the rifle to me. This is due to the optic/mount I am using right now. That of course is subject to change. For now, the gun is a lot of bench shooting just to see what my project is capable of, but that is not always going to be the case.
The question(s) is(are), what do you feel is the benefit of one or the other? Have you swapped for one out for the other? Does the PRS's adjustability really offer that much? I have a feeling the weight factor of either will actually balance the rifle out nicely. The consensus will probably be get both and that will probably be the case when I go to do another build. For right now I am wondering if I keep the UBR or cycle it out for a PRS.
Thanks for any/all input.

